Beware an Uncertain Dawn in the Dominican Republic

The law is significant, as an acknowledgement by the government that something is profoundly wrong. Unfortunately, it also managed to make a bad situation worse.

For decades, the Dominican Republic’s treatment of those who trace their roots back to neighboring Haiti has been a disgrace. Their citizenship rights have long been denied as a matter of policy, and in 2010 the Dominican constitution’s citizenship provisions were changed, all to combat the supposed threat that French names and darker skin pose to “Dominican” culture and society.

Now, some are hailing a bright new dawn of human rights in Santo Domingo, as a new law on naturalization supposedly creates a pathway to Dominican citizenship for tens of thousands of Dominicans of Haitian descent. The law is significant, as an acknowledgement by the government that something is profoundly wrong. Unfortunately, it also managed to make a bad situation worse.

What the law does is divide individuals with immigrant ancestry born in the country since 1929 into categories.  The first group is those whose births were registered by the Dominican authorities.  These individuals will now—after some administrative adjustments yet to be revealed—be considered Dominican citizens.  The second group is people whose births were never registered. They are now to register as foreigners, will receive a ‘migratory permit’, and will be eligible—but not guaranteed—to ‘naturalize’ as Dominican citizens in due course.  There’s a third group, those who have birth registration but whose documents that are suspected to be the result of fraud or ‘impersonation’ (sometimes parents of Haitian descent would ask others to register their children, simply so that they could be registered).  These are to be subject to investigation by undisclosed means.  

There are a lot of devilish details here, but let’s concentrate on the unprecedented way that the law makes citizenship dependent not on the actual fact of birth in the country – provable with a range of evidence such as medical records, baptismal records, school records, and more – but on whether or not the government registered the birth. This no basis upon which to grant citizenship, and Dominican Republic itself shows why. 

The Dominican bureaucracy has been so discriminatory and erratic over the decades there that it’s common to find families in which some children were registered at birth, while others were not.  Less than ten years ago, Santo Domingo was condemned by the Inter-American Court for refusing to register the births of children of Haitian descent. It would be fairer to ask people to answer a riddle to determine their citizenship, or to throw darts at a board.  At least then the outcome would be marginally within their control. 

Those who have birth registration, superficially better off, are still left in a state of insecurity, since their citizenship isn’t (any longer) based on a constitutional right, but on this particular law’s provisions,  which will expire in a couple of years, leaving anyone who hasn’t managed to navigate the bureaucracy in permanent limbo.

The US grants citizenship the same way the DR did until 2010—to individuals who were born on the territory.  This principle is virtually universal in the western hemisphere.  It links citizenship to independently verifiable facts that are relevant to a person’s belonging to a country, linguistically and culturally, leaving ancestry (imputed or otherwise) out of the equation.  This is logical:  a person’s identity and consequent rights can’t be determined by administrative fiat.  In basing citizenship on birth registration, the Dominican Republic is taking away the very right to have rights, substituting instead the whims, acts and omissions of local government bureaucrats over 71 years.    

The solution is for the Dominican Republic to accept that some of its citizens are a bit darker than others, and, yes, may even have Haitian-sounding names and ancestry: their citizenship should not be jeopardized by legally entrenched or individually-perpetrated racism.  The Dominican Republic needs to accept that pursuing an ethnically-pure nation is incompatible with the rule of law, even when the pursuit is decked out in court rulings and legislation. 

U.S. citizens of Dominican ancestry who got citizenship through being born here should speak out about how the principle guarantees equality of opportunity and builds a great nation.  And Vice President Joe Biden, when he visits Santo Domingo on Monday, June 16, should make it clear that while taking one step forwards after you have taken five steps back is a good thing, it is still not enough. 

2 Comments

Hide

In a country with more than 12% of its population in undocumented and irregular migratory status you can not ask our government to give citizenships to people that can´t proof the place they where born. The system you propose would allow any person that claims they where born in the Dominican Republic to be given a citizenship status and that is just not legal. The Dominican Republic is doing more for Haitian immigrants that any country has ever done for Dominican immigrants.
The country is implementing a Regularization Plan completely paid by the Dominican State, only in the first week the Plan has attracted more that 30,000 Haitian immigrants most of them in the country since 2010. At the end of the Regularization Plan we will know the real numbers of Haitian undocumented immigration and not the ones base on polls.
The Naturalization Law works for all of those Dominicans of Haitian descend that where affected by the law but as in any other country in the world they have to have some proof that they where born in the country.

Thanks Paul,

One of the big problems here is that under this new law the Dominican state is insisting that the only thing that constitutes acceptable proof of birth in the country is the fact of birth registration by a local bureaucrat - and nothing else.

What if you were born in the country and you have baptismal records, or hospital records, or sworn witness statements? In the rest of the world this evidence would be sufficient to establish the fact of birth.This creates further problems if the bureucrats in question are either inefficient, or disposed to discriminate against some people and not others.

Add your voice