Saving the Euro, Losing Trust

The following article originally appeared on the London School of Economics’ European Politics and Policy blog EUROPP.

Political fallout from the Euro crisis is raining down all over Europe—not just in Brussels and national capitals, but into society at large, where it has accelerated the decline in trust in political elites.  Populists, especially in France and the Netherlands, have been quick to capitalize on the crisis to bash the political establishment, running narratives of both conspiracy and incompetence among elites: "They screwed up their Euro project, so why should you trust them on migration?"

The dominance of intergovernmental agreements in the decision-making about the Euro, principally through the European Council, has given populists more ammunition. Voters see meeting after meeting in Brussels on their TV screens, where heads of state and government are unable to give a convincing explanation of how they will get out of the Euro mess with anything more than a short-term plan. This perception is sapping trust in government—in creditor and debtor countries alike. And it is driving a wedge between the political elite and public.

Yet the greatest loss of trust is between the member-states themselves. There are quite different narratives about the crisis and who is to blame running in Germany and Greece, but also in Finland and Italy, Ireland and the Netherlands. The German narrative is about feckless Greeks who retire at 50, while the Greek version relies on stereotypes about harsh former occupiers with no sympathy for citizens ruined by circumstances beyond their control. None of these narratives captures the complex reality. But all of them are about projecting the blame on others.

The loss of trust between EU member-states at the political level is matched by increasing mistrust in each others' institutions, which risks undermining European integration projects that have brought significant benefits to its citizens. The crisis has revealed that state institutions in countries like Greece and Hungary are much weaker, and more easily corrupted and captured, than the rest of Europe realized.

State capture and weak institutions are a major problem for a community of law like the EU, whose members rely on each others' courts to enforce common rules and regulations. This is vital for the Single Market to function as a level playing-field for companies with fair competition. It is also essential for cooperation on justice and internal security matters. EU member states have a common arrest warrant and mutual recognition of court decisions, which gives citizens the benefit of access to justice even for crimes committed in other countries. It also gives better guarantees of fair treatment if they are arrested in another EU state. But if the EU cannot trust Greek statistics and tax collection, how can it trust the Greek courts to administer justice on the same basis as in other EU member countries?

Even more importantly, the other EU members are asking themselves: can they trust the Greek border guard to police the EU’s Aegean frontier effectively and with due attention to human rights? The Schengen area of passport-free travel has given unparalleled benefits to European citizens to travel without hindrance across the continent. But it cannot function if trust ebbs away. Instead member-states will start trying to re-impose passport checks at land borders, as France has done periodically.

Trust is the oxygen in the EU’s bloodstream: the system needs trust everywhere in order to function. When trust disappears, vital functions begin to fail. Take for example the arguments over whether to let Bulgaria and Romania join the Schengen zone of passport-free travel. The Schengen members are reluctant to let them in, not only because of corruption and organized crime in those countries, but also because of mistrust of Greece. At present, Greece is a Schengen member but has no land border with the rest of the passport-free zone, so people can only travel on to other Schengen countries through the Greek seaports and airports, which are easier to police. But if Bulgaria and Romania join Schengen, human-traffickers would have a land route from Greece and also Turkey (a huge transit country) directly into Schengen. So the problem lies in trust, not only in whether Bucharest and Sofia can meet the high standards to join, but also in creating a contiguous land mass that reaches all the way to Greece.

It would be a great pity if, in the process of saving the Euro, we lose the benefits of integration and the community of law. How can the EU rebuild trust between its members, and between governments and people? Persuading the markets that the Euro’s problems are resolved is a major problem. An even bigger challenge for the European Union will be to persuade its citizens that it has a plan capable of rebuilding credible state institutions in countries like Greece.

2 Comments

Well done, thanks Heather!

Read with great pleasure as it creates a full picture of the current situation in the union. However, the Euro fall may bring about a fresh wave of economic crisis!

Perhaps the euro is not worth saving. I am certainly not asserting that it is not, but surely the option of returning to national currencies should be openly discussed. The UK and its Eurozone trading partners are able to engage in massive volumes of trade and other economic intercourse despite utilizing different currencies.This suggests to me as an economist that the EU could thrive sans the euro. To be sure "breaking up can be hard to do," but hard does not mean impossible or unjustifiable.

Add your voice