APDHE v. Obiang Family

Domestic Courts
Case Lawyer:

Download Files

APDHE, October 22, 2008
80.81 KB pdf
APDHE, October 22, 2008
75.24 KB pdf
Tracking Down Africa’s Oil Wealth

The people of Equatorial Guinea live in poverty, despite vast oil revenues. In July 2004, a U.S. Senate report found that huge sums of money had passed through Riggs Bank in the United States from Equatorial Guinea. $26 million was diverted by President Obiang from Riggs to an account in Spain of a shell company owned by him. It appears that a large portion of this money was then used to buy villas in Spain for members of his family. (Keywords: Unjust Enrichment - Corruption - Money Laundering)


The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs issued its report, Money Laundering and Foreign Corruption: Enforcement and Effectiveness of the PATRIOT Act, Case Study Involving Riggs Bank, on July 15, 2004. After extensive investigations and hearings, the subcommittee concluded that the total value of assets held by Riggs amounted to nearly $700 million, making “Equatorial Guinea” the bank’s single largest relationship. There were more than 60 accounts held by government entities, senior officials, and family members.

The report found that, for years, Riggs had disregarded its anti-money laundering obligations with regard to Equatorial Guinea and had turned a “blind eye” to evidence that the bank was handling the proceeds of foreign corruption. They had allowed, and sometimes actively facilitated, suspicious financial activity.

In one sequence of suspicious transactions highlighted in the report, approximately $26.5 million was transferred in sixteen payments over a three-and-a-half year period (2000–2003) directly from the official Equatoguinean governmental oil revenues account into a private account maintained at Banco Santander in Spain, by Kalunga Company S.A., a company the Subcommittee found reason to believe might be owned in whole or in part by President Obiang. The authorized signatories for the governmental oil revenues account were the president and either his son or his nephew.

Investigations undertaken by Open Society Justice Initiative partner organization Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos de España (APDHE) revealed close correlations in timing between at least five of these transfers and nine real estate purchases in Madrid, Gijon, and Las Palmas de Gran Canaria in the Canary Islands on behalf of the President, members of his family, and other close associates.

Open Society Justice Initiative Involvement

The Open Society Justice Initiative is assisting APDHE, a Spanish human rights organization, in investigating the facts and preparing the legal arguments in the case.


Money Laundering. The Spanish Penal Code makes it a crime for anyone to acquire, convert or transfer property knowing that such property was purchased by the proceeds from a serious crime, or for anyone to perform any other act to conceal or disguise its unlawful origin or to aid another person who has participated in the crime in evading the legal consequence of the crime. The defendants in this case regularly diverted funds from the Equatoguinean Treasury by ordering Riggs Bank to make the various transfers to private accounts held by a shell company controlled by the defendants and the President of Equatorial Guinea. The fact that the embezzlement may have been committed abroad is irrelevant because the Spanish Penal Code grants jurisdiction to Spanish courts over money laundering cases occurring in Spain, regardless of where the underlying crime occurred.


October 22, 2008. APDHE submits the Complaint (Querella) to Instructing Judge, Baltasar Garzón.
October 23, 2008. Judge Garzón refers the case to the office of the National Criminal Court Prosecutor (Fiscal de la Audiencia Nacional).
January 21, 2009. The Office of the Prosecutor (Fiscalía) concludes that there is a case to answer and opens an official investigation in the Pre-Trial Investigative Court (Juzgado de Instrucción). The prosecutor also concludes that the investigation should commence in Gran Canaria in the Canary Islands rather than in Madrid, because the Kalunga account where the money was received was not in Madrid, but at the Banco Santander in Las Palmas, Gran Canaria.
February 6, 2009. Judge Garzón issues an order ratifying the determination of the Prosecutor requiring transfer of the case to the Pre-Trial Investigative Court (Juzgado de Instrucción) in Las Palmas.


The case is currently under investigation.