Beyond the Rios Montt Trial, Guatemala’s Search for Justice Continues

Beyond the Rios Montt Trial, Guatemala’s Search for Justice Continues

Efrain Rios Montt, who headed a brutal military dictatorship in Guatemala over 30 years ago, was wheeled into court in Guatemala City last week on a hospital gurney. He was there to face a renewed trial on charges of genocide and crimes against humanity, in a resumption of the process that was overturned on a technicality in 2013, after he’d been found guilty and sentenced to 80 years in prison.

This time around, the legal maneuvering again won out: initially the defense argued their 88-year old client was too ill to attend; by the end of the day, the trial was indefinitely suspended after the defense succeeded in having the presiding judge removed.

Once again, the effort to renew the trial faced opposition from members of Guatemala’s elite with close ties to the military establishment. Once again, the outcome demonstrated the challenges inherent in attempting to prosecute mass atrocities in national courts, following a democratic transition and amid underlying political tensions.

Where does this leave Guatemala’s efforts to come to terms with the worst of the crimes committed during its decades-long internal armed conflict? Advocates of justice argue that trials are needed, not only to bring justice for the victims, such as the scores of Mayan villagers who again crowded the courtroom last week, but also to establish a shared understanding of what happened that will provide a surer basis for Guatemala’s democratic future and help prevent a recurrence of such atrocities in Guatemala and elsewhere.

So far, those court cases involving mass atrocities that have been brought to court have mostly involved lower ranking military personal. Despite the setbacks with Rios Montt, some other cases against senior officers continue:

  • Trial proceedings in what is known as the case of the Spanish embassy siege are due to close this week; the case focuses on the police’s handling of a 1980 siege at the Spanish Embassy in Guatemala, in which dozens of protestors and diplomats were killed.
  • Later this year, judges are expected to open the trial of senior officials accused of mass rape, sexual slavery and other crimes committed against indigenous women and girls at the Sepur Zarco military base in the Guatemala highlands.
  • There are a small number of cases advancing, and a massive backlog of cases given the crimes committed. Among the backlog: scores of mass graves were uncovered in 2012 on a former military base, now operating as a UN training center; a leaked military death squad diary records the forced disappearances of 183 political opponents of the former military regime. In Guatemala, the security forces forcibly disappeared over 40,000 people during the decades-long civil war, and many of those are still unaccounted for; hardly any have been prosecuted.

For the past two decades, following a 1996 peace agreement with leftist groups, victims and civil society groups have sought to bring about a reckoning with egregious crimes—including disappearances and massacres, as well as torture and sexual slavery. These cases picked up steam in the last five years under the leadership of Guatemala’s former pioneering attorney general Claudia Paz y Paz. But the prosecution of Rios Montt remains the high-water mark of this effort to go after the very top—and a demonstration of the repeated obstacles to such a prosecution.

Prosecutors allege that Rios Montt was responsible for the killing of 1,771 indigenous Mayans, the displacement of 29,000, and the rape and torture of others during 15 massacres. Nearly half of all reported violations during the bloody 36-year war occurred in 1982, the year in which Rios Montt came to power. In the Ixil region, between 70 and 90 percent of the communities were wiped out around this period.

In theory, the trial could still resume. An appellate court could designate a new judge to complete the three-judge panel in the coming days. However, it took weeks for this panel to be constituted because scores of judges declined to take part in a trial that has stirred bitter political divisions. And it took many months for the court to schedule this initial hearing. Moreover, Rios Montt has challenged numerous judges already, and there are a limited number of judges tasked to decide complex cases. Taking these factors together with the delays inherent in the judicial system, and Rios Montt’s age and failing health, Rios Montt may not live long enough to face another attempt to bring him before a court.

At the same time, an appellate court also still needs to decide on a bid by Rios Montt’s defence team to invoke a 1986 amnesty decree (passed by the then military government) to prevent his prosecution– despite its cancellation by Congress in 1996, and subsequent judicial rulings.

During the peace process, Guatemala’s congress expressly prohibited amnesties for genocide, disappearance and other international crimes—in line with international law. Any attempt to expand the existing amnesty law to include international crimes would mark a severe setback for traditional justice efforts in Guatemala, as well as being a violation of the international legal principle that international crimes cannot be covered by amnesty.

Victims still stand by the trial court’s 2013 conviction for genocide and crimes against humanity, and are seeking vindication from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. But the case remains open and unresolved.

The hurdles show how slow a national transition can be, the complexities of coming to terms with horrific crimes of the past, and the powerful influences outside of the courtroom. But the victims who again crowded the court last week in the hope of seeing justice done—decades later, and a second time over—demonstrate the significance of the continued efforts.

Learn More:

1 Comment

Hide

Apply the justice in benefit of the Guatemalan victims and send to jail for life to does who abused and are responsible. The world knows already who were and the judges should work in pro of their country man.

Add your voice