The European Union Embraces a Common Approach to Legal Aid

If you are arrested and charged with a criminal offence in the European Union, your chances of having a lawyer paid for by the state depends not just on how much money you have, but on which of the EU’s 28 member states you happen to be in at the time.

In Belgium, for instance, only between 10 and 20 per cent of the population is eligible for legal aid; in Finland, the figure is around 75 per cent; in Italy just two to three percent; in Poland, it depends on the charge, and there are no clear criteria for eligibility; in Greece there is no legal aid during early investigation stage in police custody. In addition, most countries in Europe do not have effective quality assurance mechanisms; in many places, legal aid will be provided by a trainee lawyer.

All this should start to change, now the EU has passed a new directive on the right to legal aid, which should be incorporated into national legislation across the EU by May 2019 (with the exception of Denmark, Ireland, and the UK).

In the words of Frans Timmermans, vice president of the European Commission, the directive affirms that anyone who is the subject of criminal proceedings has a right to legal protection and a lawyer they can afford. That is what the rule of law is about.”

Member states will now be required to provide legal aid to criminal suspects and accused persons without delay, at minimum prior to police questioning, investigation, and evidence gathering. Legal aid must also be available to people subject to a European Arrest Warrant, in both the executing and the issuing member state.

The new directive also establishes practical rules for how legal aid systems should operate, requiring an effective and competent legal aid authority that must make decisions diligently, respect the rights of the defense, and require member states to provide adequate funding and training of legal aid decision makers and lawyers. Member states are required to ensure that there is an effective legal aid system that is of adequate quality, and it establishes that legal aid services should be of a quality adequate to safeguard the fairness of proceedings, with due respect for the independence of the legal profession.

The directive is the last in a series of six directives on procedural criminal justice standards first envisaged in November 2009 by the so-called Stockholm roadmap. Ensuring access to legal aid is a crucial part of this vision—because it underpins the principle of “equality of arms” between prosecution and defense, is a foundation for the enjoyment of other essential fair trial rights, and ensures that the right to a fair trial is not reserved for those able to afford a lawyer.

Of the elements set out in 2009, the legal aid directive had perhaps the most difficult journey of all—reflecting the fact that the provision of legal aid has regrettably been seen by some governments as a potential financial burden. The initial draft advanced by the commission in 2013 proposed fragmented approach guaranteeing only provisional legal aid, to cover solely the initial stage of criminal proceedings—and leaving to national governments the question of how and when legal aid would be available later.

This approach risked undermining another part of the Stockholm vision, the 2013 directive guaranteeing suspects access to a lawyer; access to a lawyer is meaningless if you are unable to pay for the lawyer’s services. Ahead of negotiations on this proposal the council followed by adopting a similar position.

Luckily, this minimalist approach was ultimately countered by the European Parliament, which adopted a more ambitious counterproposal in May, 2015. That reflected in part the advocacy efforts of civil society, and in particular the Justicia European Rights Network—which includes the Open Society Justice Initiative. Justicia argued that the EU risked a two-tier system of rights, one for the rich and one for the poor, a view that was reinforced by the efforts of the European Parliament’s rapporteur on the issue, Dennis De Jong, who endorsed a comprehensive draft directive, including provisions for accessibility, eligibility, quality, and independence.

This was the essence of the final agreement between parliament, commission, and council (which represents the member states) reached this month, due in no small part to the leading role of the Dutch Presidency in pushing negotiations along during the first six months of this year to get the member states in the council to agree on a strong proposal.

In addition to advocacy efforts, the Justicia was in a position to provide critical input in the drafting process throughout. The only compromise that we regretted was the agreement to limit the guarantee of legal aid to cases in which the suspect or the accused has been physically detained by the police and in certain other situations.

It has been a long journey to get here. An initial effort by the EU in 2003 to legislate on procedural defense rights ended in failure in 2007. After the process was renewed in 2009, I myself was skeptical of the European Commission’s decision in 2010 to split the proposal for a measure on access to a lawyer and legal aid into two, leaving legal aid—the hardest part—to last. The commission argued that in the immediate aftermath of the financial crisis of 2008, governments would be even less receptive than before to making commitments to fund legal aid. In the end, the decision to leave the hard part to last paid off—leaving the European Union with the legal tools to create a more equitable criminal justice system where guilt and innocence is determined by the facts of the case, and not by how much money you have. 

Learn More:



The European Parliament legislative resolution of 4 October 2016 is a great thing for European justice system and in general for human rights.

For many of us legal aid is as important a right as medical aid..

Uganda Public Rescue Foundation (UPRF) is a non-profit Human Rights organization that offers Legal aid to indigent persons in Uganda, conceived in the year 2008 in the context of justice law and order sector (JLOS) reforms as one of the new models for improved administration of justice in Uganda. The foundation envisions a society in which disadvantaged people have improved access to justice in fulfillments of constitutional requirements. It has the mission of establishing national mechanisms for public defense of poor people and human rights promotion.

We are registered with NGO Board and the Law Council as legal aid service providers and we also have Membership with the following organization; Uganda National NGO Forum, CEDU, Foundation for human Rights initiatives (FHRI), HURINET, also we work with Human Rights Centres Uganda and Muslim Centre for Justice and Law. (See Attached certificates to this application).

We primarily address legal issues affecting indigent persons in Uganda. Programmes that seek to improve access to justice include intervention at all levels where inequality occurs through legal education and mobile clinics, protection of the rights of vulnerable groups (especially women and children in the household, community and nation) training of paralegals and community support persons, and conducting research to reform and engender the law. UPRF also operates at household level to offer legal aid services to individuals seeking mediation of interpersonal conflict primarily within the family. In addition UPRF conducts strategic litigation and documents cases that are handled as a basis for developing good practices and as a source of information for strategic litigation cases. This information also informs UPRF’s programme.

We work to fight for human rights and the poor in the area of criminal law, through court representation, counseling, mediation and prison visits with a focus on the poor charged with capital/serious offences in the higher courts and the chief magistrate’s courts. To a lesser extent, people facing less serious but complex charges in the lower courts are also assisted. In addition, to litigation UPRF conducts sensitization workshops and seminars as well as training. The sanitization targets prisoners, stakeholders and communities to appreciate the need for legal services for the poor who face criminal charges human rights violation. The training focuses on staff and pro bono lawyers. It empowers political comities to know their rights to know and enforce their social and economical rights through legal education.

The core programs under our organization are to fight for human rights, HIV/Aids and reproductive health rights, women & Children’s rights, Access to Justice and this covers, Criminal defense, Land Assistance, Succession, Petty Commercial claims, Legal technical services, peace and conflict litigation, Research, legal Education, Domestic Violence prevention and public interest litigation.

Program activities includes; legal advise, mediation, litigation, counseling, institutional visits and literature provision.

Dear sir

We thank you very much and will be sincerely be very happy if you can remember and do something concerning this tragic situation of foreigners in Togo prison .

But as a matter facts we were expecting changes from the justice of Togo Republic but all we can get from them is high sentences with hatred and wickedness more than as it was before,
For their so called azizi judgement of last month for example, in drug case a Togo citizen was giving 2 to 5 years but in the case of foreigners was given ,10 to 15 years. Most of foreigners in Togo prisons are business people.

Togo government and it authorities hate foreigners to the last.

With little offence as a foreigner they most put you in prison for year's without judgement.
We want you to use your good work in the wold to look into our problem and make foreigners to be aware of this Togo.

We are feeding ourselves here in the person. They are doing all this because the government of Togo don't spend any money on prisoners. They depend on EU and other international bodies to give them money for prisoners but prisoners feed themselves. They are using prisoners to make money for E.U. and other international bodies. This is why the Togo government always keep more prisoners so that they use the number of the prisoners to collect more money from E.U

We want to let you know that the Togo governments are collecting money from from E.U and other international bodies for each prisoner daily for their selfish interest not for prisoners.They are using prisoners as a way of collecting money from E.U

Togo prison is like a concentration camp of Germany during the time of Hitler which six million Jews were killed, so it is to us foreigners

We are dying one after another, as of last month one Mr Charles died due to none medical attention upon the money we prisoners contributed and gave to the authorities of the prison for his treatment, many foreign prisoners has died since four years I entered into this Togo prison without judgement.many are very sick without medical attention and without food.

we are sincerely honor and respect you as you hear little of what we foreigners are going through in Togo.last month a prisoner was bitten to death with the allegation that he want to run,and the told his people that the has ran away

In this regard sir with humbleness and respect to you sir and to whom it may concern, on behalf of my follow prisoners here in Lome Togo Republic, we are pleading to you to and to who it may concern to follow the process of taking us back to our countries to serve our jail their even if it will be more harder than here.
We hope that this latter we sent to you will not be in vain as it was in the past, we are expecting to hear from you soon concerning this letter

Thanks and God bless E.U
Thanks from yemi

On be half of the foreign prisoners in Lome Togo

Add your voice