Making Progress on Freedom of Information in Africa

In the decade since 2004, the number of countries with freedom of information (FOI) laws in Africa has grown from four to thirteen. Countries that have adopted these laws include Sierra Leone, Niger, Tunisia, Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Uganda, Zimbabwe.

But passing a law is one thing; turning it into a tool that gives citizens genuine access to information about the workings of their governments is another. For those countries which have FOI laws in place, the focus is now on implementation, even as more countries work towards joining their ranks.

Among those who do have FOI laws on the books, an incipient body of practice and court decisions is being established by civic groups and members of the public, seeking to use these new laws to enhance local accountability, promote transparency in public procurement and governance generally; and uphold economic, social welfare and cultural rights. Some other areas in which advocates are using these new laws to good effect include access to public and reproductive health information, and access to basic needs such as power, sanitation and water.

Although the legal texts vary from country to country, the problems confronting the implementation of FOI laws in various African countries are similar in many ways. Technical capacity has been a major constraint. In some countries, such as Uganda, delays in the preparation of implementation regulations required by their respective access to information laws stalled the effective implementation of the law for nearly five years, until the regulations were eventually established by the government with the support of civil society actors in the country and beyond.

There have also been challenges with ensuring that the courts have sufficient expertise in both applying FOI laws, and resolving disputes on disclosure and exemptions. Nigeria has undertaken steps to upgrade judicial capacity in this respect. With the assistance of the Open Society Foundations and the UK’s Department for International Development, Nigeria’s National Judicial Institute (NJI) organized a path-breaking judicial studies programme in May 2014 on FOI adjudication for over 350 senior judges drawn from the 77 Superior Courts of Record across the country. 

The faculty for the course included experts in access to information law and practice as well as senior judges from other common law countries, including Sandile Ngcobo, South Africa’s immediate past Chief Justice, and Kenneth Kakuru of the Ugandan Court of Appeal. Following the success of this course, initiatives are now underway to organize a similar programme for judges in Sierra Leone and Uganda.

Another area in which innovation and adaptation has been required is in monitoring and overseeing compliance. In Nigeria, the Justice Minister who has statutory responsibility for overseeing compliance with the FOI Act, has established a website——through which he provides regular reporting on compliance with disclosure requests. To also facilitate oversight of compliance, Nigeria’s House of Representatives created a new Committee on Reform of Government Institutions responsible for overseeing compliance with the law. This committee holds regular hearings and undertakes regular visits to government departments to encourage establishment of systems for implementing the law effectively.

Perhaps not surprisingly, although regrettably, public officers, departments and agencies in most countries often appear unhappy with the requirements of proactive disclosure. The African Commission’s Special Rapporteur, Faith Pansy Tlakula, has identified this as an area for intervention by her mechanism. In July 2014, she secured the commitment and support of the Executive Secretary of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) to establish and implement clear protocols on proactive disclosure within the SADC. A joint technical team constituted by the SADC Secretariat and the Special Rapporteur will oversee this process. On its part the AUC’s Department of Political of Affairs is also working with the African Commission’s Special Rapporteur to develop a joint work-plan for advancing the cause of access to information in Africa, which would hopefully kick-in in 2015.

Perhaps the biggest single constraint to the effective implementation of access to information in Africa is the regional challenge of insecurity and mass-casualty terrorism. Negotiating the balance between guaranteeing public safety and security on the one hand and open and transparent government on the other has not been easy. On this, the new global Principles on National Security and Freedom of Information, adopted in Tshwane, South Africa in 2013 provide some guidance. Adopted with the support and participation of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the Tshwane Principles are now under consideration by various governments in Africa, including Nigeria, Rwanda, and Uganda, for ideas that can assist their elected governments in managing counter-terrorism under an elected government.

Meanwhile, more countries are continuing work towards passing FOI laws of their own, a task now made easier by the adoption by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in April 2013 of a new “model law” on access to information in Africa—essentially a template that any country can adapt to create a law, rather than having to start from scratch each time.

The model law, which has also been endorsed by the African Union, appears to have accelerated efforts to adopt access to information laws in many countries such as Malawi, Mozambique, Ghana, Kenya, Sierra Leone, Cote D’Ivoire, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Namibia. The model law has also contributed to the standards for the SADC disclosure protocols discussed above, which may in turn lead to it becoming a model for SADC countries generally.

Africa has made and continues to make significant progress on adoption of access to information law. Advocates in various countries are also slowly addressing obstacles in the implementation of these laws. The experience has been mixed; progress has been uneven but the experiments being modeled in different countries show promising examples of how advocates are working to confront and overcome the obstacles to the realization of open government in Africa.

Learn More:



Dear Chidi & Max,
I bring you greetings. I appreciate your effort and all of you that have dedicated your lives to Open Government. One possible ways to implement access to information in Africa apart from legislative advocacy is training and guidelines on record handling and sharing. There is need for staff training and re training on FOIA litigation and procedural release of records and documentation. There is also a need for open access journal on Journal of Open Government.
Implementing the Act is not without teething problem. The raging debate on FOIA is domestication. The proponents of domestication share in ignorance that the National Assembly share legislative competence on information, public records and archives with state House of Assembly. by par. 4 of 2nd Schedule of 1999 Constitution CFRN and par 68 pt. 1 of 2nd schedule to CFRN 1999. My position is that FOIA is not a treaty. Again, on the principle of covering the field, the federal legislation supersedes.
Part of the advance of the Act is to make vital part of chapter II of the Constitution justiciable. The jurisdiction of the Public Complaint Commission should be stretched to accommodate disclosure notices as Information Tribunal in UK.
The AGF should release a memo on FOIA implementation yearly. One of the grey areas of FOIA 2011 of Nigeria is the question of whether a request for information includes computer generated information or just paper record.
The court should hear FOIA application and must balance national security and the unrestricted access to vital official records. The Johannesburg and Tshaware principles are of aid. It is clear that government belongs to the people and the court should not hid information which ordinarily belongs to the people from them. Who owns government? It is the people. Public records belong to them and so the security agencies should nor cry more than the bereaved.
I look forward to be part of a team that is interested in a research work on access to information in Africa: comparative look.
Aigbokhan President
@Kpresident (twitter handle)

This is a lot of information in a few words. It's like a lot is happening in this area. It's good to get information on Africa that is not about war, starvation, suffering, Ebola. More of this please. Thanks

what are the ways that the governments may implement the requirements of the bill?

Add your voice