Why Is the World Bank Excluding People with Disabilities?

Why Is the World Bank Excluding People with Disabilities?

This is an opportune moment. The World Bank is currently reviewing its policies related to environmental and social safeguards on investments. That the Bank has until now not taken into account the rights and needs of people with disabilities in these policies is a blatant disregard of basic human rights that must be rectified.

The World Bank provides loans to developing countries worth millions of dollars every year to finance infrastructure projects. Prior to the loans being made, the infrastructure projects must pass rigorous examination to ensure that all adverse impacts on the environment and on people are identified. If the potential impacts are servere, projects may be cancelled altogether. For less severe impacts, designs are ammended and project activities altered. These rules are clearly set out in the Bank’s Social and Environmental Safeguard Policies. But these policies fail to include guidelines to ensure that projects take people with disabilities into account.

Development projects and policies that are not inclusive are discriminatory and affect people with disabilities disproportionately. As it stands, people with disabilities who live in a house that will be appropriated by the government because it lies within a World Bank financed road expansion project risk neither being properly informed, nor receiving appropriate compensation. Often people with disabilities are poor and face disproportionate financial, physical, and emotional stress when their living environment–and in some cases economic activity–changes.

People with disabilities cannot get involved in the planning stages and provide feedback on proposed infrastructure development projects that affect their homes if they are not even being consulted beforehand. Public consultations are carried out without their participation, and the documentation that is provided is not made accessible to people with intellectual disabilities. It is vital that the World Bank–and its development partners–begin to include in their stakeholder analysis and public consultations people with disabilities, and this consultation requirement must be set out in its Safeguard Policies.

As it happens, the World Bank is in the process of modernizing its policies–a process which will last two years and be completed by 2014. Now is the time for the Bank to include all people in its Safeguard Policies. But the Bank must also go a step further: new projects must be expressly designed to reduce poverty among people with disabilities who are among the world’s poorest and most vulnerable.

About 80 percent of the world’s estimated 1 billion people with disabilities live in developing countries, most of them in abject poverty. It is a well-known fact that poverty and disability mutually reinforce each other and lead to a downwards spiral. In spite of their numbers, they have been systematically left out of development programs and national policies. This exclusion violates their rights and excludes them from opportunities to benefit from national programs, including poverty reduction projects. People with intellectual disabilities or mental health problems face particularly extreme discrimination and exclusion from society, with hundreds of thousands living in isolated long-stay residential institutions.

In January, Results International released a report documenting how the World Bank falls drastically short in making education available for children with disabilities in its education aid programs in Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and the Philippines. According to the report,  “the World Bank talks about disability a lot in its program design but few of its programs address specific measures for access by marginalized groups, including those with disabilities and special needs. None of the Bank’s programs in the three countries mentioned disability in their evaluations.”

The World Bank commissioned a report in 2006, Making Inclusion Operational, that is meant to provide guidelines and resources for Bank staff to include “disability issues” in investment projects. Six years later it is high time that the World Bank act on this and design poverty reduction projects that include the world’s most neglected, vulnerable, and poor.

Learn More:



Informative article! I concur with statistics of 1 billion people living with some form of disability - they ought to be included in the planning process afterall the policies will affect them - the CRPD can provide framework of reasonable accomodation, accessibility, inclusion and development of abilities and potential e.g. accessibility is a key point in the sense of how an individual interacts with the world, access to information in formats they can understand, provide ramps for the physical impairements, provision of assistive devices - instrumental to the function of an individual with disability - development projects ought to harness and develop this marginalized community especially in the developing countries. Assuming we have 7 billion people in the world thats 14.3% of people caught up in a cycle of dependence, homelessness, desolation and to the mercy of the society. They are subjects with rights and they can be able to participate in the labor market, create employment and be productive despite the disability - disability arises from the perception of the society of any impairment that resides in an individual(s) - its time the World Bank played its Inter-Governmental role as a key development partner to influence development not just on infrastructure and economy but human capital, potential and ability. There is diversity in our humanity including our perceived deficits namely disabilities (various sensory, cognitive, physical, psychological) - diversity and respect for difference provides a basis for inherent human dignity worth of investing in to build a more inclusive, just, humane and tolerable world.

We should be able to get loans just like anyone else the banks and credit unions tell you come on in we will give you a loan but they dont and I though that there was a law that they had to help you.

Add your voice