At the UN, New Voices Call for an End to the Drug War

We don’t have a magic recipe, but we are trying to find a way out.
Diego Cánepa, adviser to the president of Uruguay

In the most recent session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs—the lead policymaking body for drug control at the UN—governments from Latin America to Europe to Africa expressed frustration over the violence, mass incarceration, and health epidemics resulting from international drug laws.

Though there is no question that proponents of the status quo are still many, a number of governments are calling for drug policies that respect human rights, promote public health, and reduce crime.

“The costs of the drug war are not only economic, but also human, because people have been sacrificed in our actions to tackle the drug problem,” said the Colombian minister of justice, Gómez Mendez.

Diego Cánepa, adviser to the president of Uruguay, added, “Since 1961, due to a rigid and narrow interpretation of the UN drug conventions, there has been one single means to control the use of cannabis: criminalization has been imposed. We don’t have a magic recipe, but we are trying to find a way out.”

The Mexican delegation argued that health policies should be prioritized over the criminalization of drug use and that a thorough review of international drug strategies is required.

Ecuador expressed deep concerns about the failures of the current system, and Guatemala urged revision of drug control treaties.

While Latin America is leading the calls for a debate on the international drug control system, many other governments are also supporting a thorough review of harsh, criminal justice–oriented approaches to drugs.

For example, a group of countries including Sierra Leone and Namibia advocated for abolition of the death penalty for drug-related offenses. This brings fresh African voices to a coalition of nations that have expressed concern for human rights abuses in drug control.

The delegate from the Czech Republic said, “We should not be driven by ideologies and wishful thinking. We unfortunately know today that the idea of a drug-free world based on the belief that, if we eradicate supply, we will reduce demand, is not achievable. We should look to and evaluate alternative regimes… rather than just be silent about it.”

The preparations for this year’s Commission on Narcotic Drugs in March were fraught with discord as governments that favor harsh criminal justice policies have been trying to push back against historic cannabis reforms in the United States and Uruguay.

The final statement emerging from the so-called high-level segment of the Commission was a weak compromise. As the International Drug Policy Consortium noted, some of the most innovative language that took account of new approaches, criticized extreme punishments like the death penalty, and acknowledged the opening of an international debate, was struck out from earlier drafts.  

Nevertheless, the debate itself was carried out for all to see. And the event was only a preview of what’s to come.

A broader debate on drug policy is due to take place at the UN General Assembly, the main policymaking body for the entire United Nations, in 2016. It is already being anticipated as a historic showdown on international drug policy.

Leading up to the Assembly, the Open Society Foundations will continue efforts to further the debate by bringing civil society groups and governments together, calling on policymakers to enact change, and raising awareness of the issues.

7 Comments

Hide

Until the the West ceases undermining fair and equitable social, economic and political conditions in drug source countries these people will be forced to manufacture and distribute illegal drugs to feed their families. Try spending the money on infrastructure to house, feed and school the population so there are real alternatives to growing these drugs. Besides the biggest drug lords on the planet are the tobacco companies. They cause more death and destruction than all the other drug lords combined.

Thanks Daniel. Tobacco policy may indeed have some lessons. It shows you can reduce use through education and pricing, as they've done in the States, without wholesale criminalization. While tobacco is certainly damaging there may be things to learn from its recently stringent regulations.

Make the War on Drugs a Civil Rights issue, since Drug Prohibition was started in the U.S. against Hispanics, Blacks and Filipinos, then taken around the globe with insistence from the U.S. And who is most harmed by the War on Drugs?

As long as people confuse the fight against prohibition with the freedom to make loads of money we are not making any progress.

More governments in Africa need to add their voices in the war on dangerous drugs. With their concerted efforts,we are likely to see a shift in policy at the UN with policies that promote human rights,public safety and scientific research being adopted in the war on dangerous drugs.

When small countries like Switzerland & Portugal dared to stand up against UN , there is hope that the rest will follow. Especially as we see the enormous benefits they have had. My hope is that our generation is the last to be harmed by this terrible War on Drugs

UN drug prohibition treaties are at the heart of the drug prohibition problem and many corollary, prohibition-driven problems. The answer is the amendment of UN drug treaties like the Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) draft of "Proposed Amendment of UN Drug Treaties." See the draft at http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/amend-un-treaties-to?source=c.fwd&r_by=... and a petition supporting it.

Add your voice