Incitement on Trial: Prosecuting International Speech Crimes
Public Figures Use Hate Speech to Incite Violence. How Do We Prosecute Them for It?Voices
International and national armed conflicts are often preceded by a media campaign in which public figures foment ethnic, national, racial, or religious hatred, inciting listeners to acts of violence. But how can the perpetrators of such hate be held accountable under international law for consequent atrocities?
Join Richard Ashby Wilson in a discussion of his new book, Incitement on Trial, which evaluates the efforts so far of international criminal tribunals to hold such inciters criminally responsible.
This book identifies “revenge speech” as the type of rhetoric with the greatest effects on empathy and tolerance for violence, but notes that prosecutors have often struggled to demonstrate a causal connection between speech acts and subsequent crimes.
Drawing on extensive original research, this book proposes an evidence-based risk assessment model for monitoring political speech.
Wilson, a legal scholar who focuses on transitional justice, is joined by international criminal and human rights law expert Marko Milanovic and by Nadine Strossen, a former head of the ACLU, who has taught and advocated extensively on constitutional law and civil liberties. The discussion is moderated by Aryeh Neier, president emeritus of the Open Society Foundations.
Aryeh Neier is president emeritus of the Open Society Foundations.
Richard Ashby Wilson is the Gladstein Distinguished Chair of Human Rights and professor of law and anthropology at UConn School of Law, and founding director of the Human Rights Institute at UConn.
Marko Milanovic is associate professor at the University of Nottingham School of Law.
Nadine Strossen is the John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law at New York Law School (via video).
Linda Lakhdhir is a legal advisor in the Asia Division of Human Rights Watch (via video).
Financing Atrocity, Forging Accountability: New Strategies for International Justice
Economic crimes and grave violence often occur in tandem. But commercial companies involved in facilitating serious international crimes—or profiting from them—have rarely been held accountable by international courts.
A New Beginning
For a Better Future, Sudan Must Confront Its Past
With Omar al-Bashir no longer in power, the temptation to move beyond his regime’s crimes is understandable. But unless Sudan grapples with its past, it risks trading one corrupt dictatorship for another.
How Can We Fix the International Criminal Court?
Phil Clark urges a major rethink about how the International Criminal Court operates, especially in the Global South.