In October 2004, the European Commission launched a public consultation on the scope, missions and tasks of the future Fundamental Rights Agency of the European Union. This consultation follows the decision of the heads of the states and governments of EU member states, taken in December 2003, to extend the mandate of the Vienna-based European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) into a Fundamental Rights Agency.
The Commission’s communication highlights that the Agency should be a “crossroads”, facilitating contacts between the different players in the field of fundamental rights; allowing synergies and increased dialogue between all the stakeholders concerned; and satisfying the needs of, respectively, the EU institutions, the member states and civil society.
However, the communication also makes it clear that the Agency will have neither judicial nor decision-making powers. In addition, it emphasizes that the tasks of the Agency, which will be set up by an instrument of secondary legislation (regulation), should not encroach on the powers conferred on the EU institutions by existing treaties, and more particularly on the supervisory role of the European Commission as regards the application of the community law.
This paper analyzes some aspects of the debate about the role of the Agency, focusing on the definition of the Agency’s field of action, its remit, its tasks, and the synergies it might develop with European and international institutions active in the field of human rights.
Download
-
Establishment of a European Agency on Fundamental Rights: Opportunities and Challenges (276.37 Kb pdf file)
Download the complete paper.
Read more
Resilience in Moldova
Q&A: Moldova’s Path to a European Future
Moldova has endured the Kremlin’s aggression because it has chosen to leave Russia's sphere of influence and supports Ukraine. The impact of the war on daily life—and why the nation is determined to join the EU.
Rethinking the EU
In an Age of Crisis, an Opportunity to Remake the EU
From climate change to rising authoritarianism, Europe is facing a range of crises that threaten the way we live. The EU must seize the opportunity to reshape how it works and rethink what role it plays in a changing world.
Corporate Responsibility
Q&A: Why (Some) Investors Want More Regulation
As the EU works on rules to protect worker rights and the planet from corporate harm, Open Society’s Jon Jacoby spoke to Anita Dorett, of the Investor Alliance for Human Rights, about how investors are pushing for change.