Why the European Union Needs Anticorruption SanctionsA powerful tool in the fight against corruption
In December 2020, the EU adopted the landmark EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, but unlike its allies, failed to include corruption as a sanctionable activity. Recent revelations from the Pandora and Panama Papers shone a spotlight on secret offshore accounts in western jurisdictions and show the urgent need to act against kleptocratic and illicit money flows.
This global political momentum in the fight against corruption—together with a growing realization that corruption is a threat to the stability and security of democracy, rule of law, and human rights—is a crucial opportunity for the EU and its member states to adopt legally sound anti-corruption sanctions. Furthermore, adopting a robust anticorruption sanctions regime would enable the EU to coordinate with like-minded allies such as the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, to meet its foreign policy objectives.
Why the European Union Needs Anticorruption Sanctions (222.85 Kb pdf file)
Download the 14-page policy brief.
Q&A: Why (Some) Investors Want More Regulation
As the EU works on rules to protect worker rights and the planet from corporate harm, Open Society’s Jon Jacoby spoke to Anita Dorett, of the Investor Alliance for Human Rights, about how investors are pushing for change.
EU Green Deal
The EU Must Think Globally on Carbon Import Tax
A proposed EU carbon import tax risks hurting poorer countries by stunting trade and slowing their green transition.
Quality over Quantity
The Real Question about EU Sanctions
It’s true that sanctions disrupt the plans of wealthy autocrats. But to implement them in a moral and ethical way, policymakers must establish clear rules and oversight.