Facing Europe’s Crisis of Alienation and Mistrust

Recently, British Prime Minister Theresa May invoked Article 50, officially triggering the negotiation process for the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union. The political earthquake of Brexit is just one of the challenges Europe must now confront.

Europe faces an entangled set of precarious problems, including slow and uneven socioeconomic recovery, increasing migration, and geopolitical security challenges. These problems, along with other rapid social and economic changes to our societies, have sparked a more pervasive and unsettling crisis—a crisis of mistrust, marked by deep feelings of insecurity, anxiety, and suspicion.

Over the last decade, many Europeans have lost faith in their institutions, their politicians, their sources of knowledge, and above all, in each other. A widespread sense of precariousness and pessimism has swept through the European Union. Many voters no longer trust politicians and political institutions.

2016 study by Demos [PDF], for example, found “strikingly low levels of trust” in both national and EU institutions, with over half those surveyed in Britain, France, Germany, and Spain reporting low levels of trust in the European Commission—as well as their own national governments. A consequence of this unease has been a surge of support for populist and nationalist movements, and a backlash against European institutions.

The crisis of mistrust is not limited to governments, however. We also see increasing numbers of Europeans rejecting scientific knowledge: the resurgence of diseases like measles and whooping cough (pertussis)—including an ongoing outbreak of measles in Italy, Romania, and several other European countries—has been linked to the spread of anti-vaccine sentiments. Like many of the problems we now face, this public health crisis is self-imposed and completely avoidable—an epidemic of disease spread through an epidemic of mistrust.

Mistrust is fueled by fear, and the resurgent politics of fear have diminished Europeans’ trust in one another further still. Fear makes people seek scapegoats, others whom they can blame for their problems and anxieties. This inclination targets the most vulnerable people in society: minorities and marginalized groups, such as Muslims, Roma, refugees, and LGBT people. False rumors about migrants and refugees have become so common in Germany, for example, that one citizen created a hoax map to track them.

Fear also leads people to look for simple explanations and easy solutions. Instead of looking for evidence-based policies to address their problems and working together to pursue them, they become prone to conspiracy theories. Like the search for scapegoats, by turning to conspiracy theories, people deny their own responsibility and agency—and obscure the real solutions to the problems that they face.

European societies are in dire need of new solutions. But in order to inspire and lead Europe through these crises, leaders who could implement solutions need to have the legitimacy conferred by the trust of their citizens. The lack of civil society voices in policy debates has contributed to the crisis of faith in Europe’s political institutions—and fueled the perception that national governments and the European Union are not accountable to their citizens.

Too often, EU policymakers who want to discuss and solve these problems repeat the mistake of only talking to the same people in the same venues. These high-level policy conversations are strikingly lacking in diversity—not just in terms of race and gender, but also class, geography, professional or educational background, and politics.

There is a critical need to create more inclusive spaces for discussion and debate, and find ways to bring policymakers closer to the everyday experiences of European citizens—from majorities and minorities alike. To that end, the Open Society Initiative for Europe is working to bring unheard voices into these settings—whether by inviting civil society activists to high-level conferences like the Globsec Tatra Summit so they can engage personally with government ministers and senior bureaucrats, or helping support projects like Debating Europe, which allows people to create online debates on the topics that are important to them and then question participating European leaders about these issues.

If we can create avenues for sharing the concerns and perspectives that elites have too easily overlooked, we can begin to build understanding between the policy elite and the grassroots. Having these difficult discussions is the first step to rebuilding the trust Europe needs to face the future. 

Learn More:



' . . . people deny their own responsibility and agency . . . ' - They don't deny it, they are victims to an embedded normative prescriptivism, a prescriptivism which is instead referred to as 'societal' with an attendant luster; A luster which has been manipulated by the felicitous into prescriptiveness as panacea.

How is prescriptiveness inevitably considered mistaken and never thought machinated? Is this not the 21st century, 500 years post Machiavelli? Isn't Machiavellianism an indispensable presumption?

For example, considering the phrasal '. . . need to have the legitimacy . . ' . How is this phrasal not a potentially cryptic call for efficacious propaganda promoting illegitimacy into legitimacy?

My point isn't that this article or the above phrasal is propaganda but that a lack of awareness in such matters is attributed to the mind-deadening effects of prescriptivism as 'societal'.

If you can see neither the reliance of the public at large nor the machinating aspects of authority you can't really be considered liberal.

We need iniciatives of this nature here in Brazil and south america, specially after the coup.

When I was a little boy I read a tale about an old Chinese lady making a small tinny needle out of a big piece of metal which she was working on, beside a small creek. The moral of that story was only 1 word: PATIENCE. There are other single words like that, that define human behavior regardless of geographic location or time. Cheers.

Much distrust with the EU can probably be traced to its open border policies, and its dictatorial attitude towards the "settling" of the thousands of so called "migrants" who are invading the continent. To request is one thing, to order is another. The EU seems to be careless as to who arrives. Are they terrorists, criminals, fleeing genuine persecution, or looking for the benefits being given by countries without the need to earn them.

We all might come with different ideas how to help the DREAM of European Union, beside different analysis. We might come with ideas like creating organizations that would provide real intelligence to policy makers of EU, identifying the dangers that the EU dream faces etc. I want to emphasize only one thing the biggest threat for that DREAM comes from within EU. It's the mindset of European policy makers and money shakers. They have to use a different mindset when it comes to taking decisions about Europe and a different kind of mindset when it comes to other non European countries. Europe could use the idea of globalization NOT to be used from that idea. Its tricky sometimes but still simple: Europe should always come FIRST. One more thing crypto currencies are not momentarily in the best interest of EU. Cheers.

Add your voice