How to Slash the Cost and Size of Overcrowded U.S. Prisons

We can cut prison overcrowding in half and at the same time save billions of dollars, according to a report from the Urban Institute.

The Urban Institute has released a significant report outlining that the most effective way to slash the size and cost of overcrowded prisons in the U.S. is to introduce a mix of reforms to sentencing, prosecution, and early release policies.

Stemming the Tide: Strategies to Reduce the Growth and Cut the Cost of the Federal Prison System assesses two major options for reform. The front-end option would curb future growth by reducing the number of new prisoners and issuing shorter sentences. The back-end approach would ease overcrowding by releasing prisoners early or transferring them to community correction centers.

The report finds that neither option by itself will make a dent in alleviating the crisis in our criminal justice system. But, together, both approaches could make a significant difference.

Today, long and unreasonable drug sentences drive the federal prison population’s unsustainable growth. Decreasing both the number of people headed to prison as well as the length of their sentences would be the most direct way to slow the federal prison growth.

In fact, the report conservatively estimates that reducing the number of people entering prison for drug offenses by 20 percent would save nearly $1.3 billion over the next 10 years. Reducing drug sentences by 20 percent would save $1.1 billion during the same timeframe.

But the report finds that reducing the mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses by half would save about $2.5 billion over the next 10 years.

Just as importantly, such a reform would strike a blow against overcrowded prisons by cutting the overcrowding problem in half so that, on average, prisons would operate at 20 percent above capacity. Federal prisons currently operate at between 35 to 40 percent above capacity. Even worse, the most secure prisons in the U.S. have 51 percent more prisoners than they were designed to handle. Even medium security prisons have 47 percent more prisoners than they can handle.

These numbers demonstrate striking savings, but they could be even greater if combined with other reforms that reduce the population and cut costs. These policy changes include letting judges have a greater say in sentencing; decreasing the minimum amount of time prisoners are required to serve; extending more earned and good time credits; and releasing elderly and terminally ill prisoners earlier than scheduled.

There is one more idea to inject more fairness and lessen the financial burden on the criminal justice system. Congress could eliminate disparate cocaine sentencing terms for those prisoners sentenced before Congress approved the Fair Sentencing Act. Their sentences are longer and harsher than those who received shorter sentences after the law was passed. 

Fortunately, this is not a liberal or conservative issue. There is bipartisan interest and support for all of these measures. Moreover, there is proof at the state level that these reforms work. Pilot programs run by state governments have achieved the twin goals of reducing the prison population and saving money without adversely impacting public safety. 

The Urban Institute’s report offers the Obama administration a plan to augment Attorney General Eric Holder’s Smart on Crime proposals and it gives Congress a road map to reduce the growth and costs of the federal prison system. 



Amazing stuff!

Amnesty for people serving time for drugs may sound radical but when Ecuador did it about 5 or 6 years ago, the number of people who reoffended turn out to be incredibly low. In other words, prison is not a deterrent -- but getting caught is.

Great article!

The prisons are overcrowded because there too many people committing crimes. There are too many people committing crimes because civilised society based on law and order is breaking down.

The early release of convicted criminals just injects more criminals back into commit more crimes, it's not rocket science.

Admittance into a self sustaining open prison system built on respect for one another would be a less expensive, more productive and effective means of allowing a prisoner the opportunity to demonstrate they are ready to be productive in society. If a prisoner can't exist in an open environment they probably won't make it back in society. If they learn to live while respecting others, they probably will.

Excellent article, I recently posted a 2 part article summarizing history of the US prison system and my own ideas for fixing the unsustainable overcrowding. Primarily by redirecting funding away from ineffective arrest policies and into rehabilitation, families and communities. Feel free to share if you find it interesting.
Part 1 -
Part 2 -

There is disparity in sentencing and there should be prison reform. These leads advocacy groups to believe that commutation and reduced sentencing is going to cure all. With a concerted effort to change their behaviors and the restrictions placed on the convicted once they are released, we will only increase the recidivism rate. These are good people, most from bad circumstances. You can't lock em up and place them back into the same environment wherein they will be worst off than they were when they weren't imprison. It is difficult for a convicted felon to obtain an above the minimum wage job or state/federal services. Essentially, they are still being punished when they get out. We need to reform the free world, changing sentencing laws, fix the laws to allow early releases for program participation, reinvest the money saved to provide more programming opportunities and teachers.

Add your voice