How UK Politicians Laid the Groundwork for Brexit’s Hate Crime Surge

Since the Brexit referendum, the UK has witnessed an explosion in racism and hate crimes. In the second half of June, when the vote took place, some 3,219 hate crimes and incidents were reported to the British police forces. This represented a 37 percent increase compared to the same period last year. But it wasn’t the vote itself that generated the hostility—it was the environment of intolerance that’s been cultivated by UK politicians for years.

Thirty years ago, when I first arrived in the UK, Margaret Thatcher was already disparaging migrants. Ever since then, in election after election, we have seen politicians use migrants as a scapegoat for the shortcomings of their own failed policies. They accuse us of refusing to learn English and tell voters that migrants don’t want to work—or, paradoxically, that we are taking all of the jobs.

The situation reached a fever pitch with the Brexit vote, during which the British people were told repeatedly that by leaving the EU they would get back their country, as if they had lost it in the first place.

Migration has long been presented as out of control and a threat to the British way of life. This has led to a string of restrictive migration policies—for instance, the introduction of the net migration cap in 2011, which gave credence to the notion that there are too many migrants in the country. The “Go Home” van campaign, in which roving vehicles displayed advertisements warning migrants to return to their home countries or face the consequences, took the hostility to a new level. These relentless efforts to establish migration as a problem in the public consciousness had already fostered an antimigrant environment by the time the referendum rolled around.

During the referendum campaign, the Leave side used the immigration issue as a wedge, while the Remain side failed to prevent it from being exploited. Ranging from the distasteful Breaking Point posters to the focus on access to benefits as a key concession to get from the EU for the UK to stay in, migrants were once again presented as a burden or a threat. Even though it has been proven that migration brings a net fiscal benefit to societies, no side of the campaign voiced that argument.

The referendum campaigns gave the public license to express racist and xenophobic views, and the media provided a unique opportunity for those views to be heard and amplified. I remember watching a woman in Harlow saying on national TV, “We are British. We don’t want all the other people. We only just want us.” Racism on daytime television had become completely normalized.

In community meetings we organized before and after the referendum, migrants expressed concerns about the uncertainty of their future status in the UK. Would they be asked to leave? Would they have to close down their businesses and take their children out of school? Not having the right to vote in a referendum about their own future made them feel powerless while the debate about them rolled on, and the outcome made them feel genuinely sad. Europe means a lot to migrants. Most migrants feel European, and freedom of movement is sacred to them. Shortly after the vote, then Home Secretary Theresa May added to the sense of uncertainty by refusing to guarantee EU migrants’ legal status in the UK.

In all of this negativity, there remain opportunities. Since the referendum, ordinary people have stood up for migrants by the thousands. There is also a renewed focus on reporting the real extent of racism and hate crimes—to this day, most hate crimes go unreported. Some victims don’t know what a hate crime is, or where or how to report it. We know, because we talk with migrant communities, that the attacks are real, and that the fear is real.

Politicians must understand that they have fueled this. They need to stop talking about migrants negatively, and using us to divert attention from policy blunders. It is vital that migrants are part of the discussion about the future of the society they have invested in. 

Learn More:



As a sign of the times, when people feel frightened about the future: climate change, war and a government set on making the poor poorer, they will turn their fears toward others, putting the blame elsewhere.

Stop attacking the message and address the fears. First, all immigrants endure discrimination-this is not unique. And immigrants whose members kill people at random are going to feel the intolerance.

People are afraid. Acknowledge their fears and stop belittling them. Make them feel secure, help them see the value of immigrants and their contributions to society.
Then you will begin to start the healing process.

The EU referendum campaign marked, what I am hoping was, the nadir of British politics. It made me ashamed to be British. Let's hope this country will never again sink to such depths.

Having spent time watching the EU idea of democracy with Juncker with his fingers in his ears well I am proud we stood together against the EU Political Cartel which has refused to consider the people.

I am afraid this article will do nothing to help migrants anywhere.

Fear of immigrants is as old as the sea. Margaret Thatcher did not invent it or use it any more than any other leader in any other society at any time. Fear should not be cast as wrong in itself - only allayed. People do fear change especially rapid change and if familiar things that define your identity and give you a sense of belonging are taken away or seem to be taken away, you will be anxious.

I too am an immigrant of 30 years in the UK and I don't recognise the picture you are painting. I walk around freely in my town and dont see any difference. I have experienced far worse in the countries I have lived in - and escaped from - India, Sri Lanka and Malaysia. Ask the Chinese in Malaysia how secure they feel.
Britain is one of the more liberal and accepting societies - hence a lot of people want to come here. Not perfect and I dare say from time to time, there is increased tension. But your article is way off beam.

Every country has a responsibility to exercise diligence in protecting its citizens both economically and physically. If hate crimes are on the rise, that can't be tolerated. To change a culture and not for the better is just shameful. Respect your citizens and the hate will diffuse. Validate their feelings and concerns they are real

The Referendum 'debate' - if you can call it that - hit new lows. To say that other countries are worse than Britain is to miss the point. Two wrongs don't make a right, right? Brexit doesn't just mean Brexit. It means Bracism: a pernicious, officially sanctioned thuggery that's trying to convince us it's politics as normal. Well, it's not. Nazek Ramadan's on the money.

I'm pretty sure the assaults and rapes by migrants far outweighs the number of "hate crimes". Hence one of the reasons the Britsh people of Britain execised their right to sovereignty by keeping floods of non-British people from dominating entire parts of the country as seen in France and Norway.

Add your voice