What’s Better Cannabis Policy Worth to England and Wales? Hint: A £ot

A report provides 1.25 billion reasons to reform cannabis policy.

There are 1.25 billion new reasons to support cannabis reform.

That’s the potential value of a regulated cannabis market in England and Wales, based on cost savings and possible revenues.

With support from Open Society Global Drug Policy Program, the Beckley Foundation commissioned a cost-benefit analysis of cannabis reform. Even after accounting for monitoring, treatment for problematic users and other possible costs, the study found there could be a net benefit of up to £1.25 billion a year (including revenues of between £400 million–£900 million).

Merely ceasing to arrest, prosecute, and jail cannabis offenders would save £200–£300 million annually in England and Wales.

There are naturally some risks associated with any new policy and this cost-benefit analysis, carried out by University of Essex’s Institute for Social and Economic Research, considers a number of possible effects.

However, according to the study, the reform would provide the government with the funds to address negative impacts while leaving considerable money to spend on prevention. Furthermore, it would give police more resources to go after violent criminals, rather than being preoccupied by ineffective—and even discriminatory—policing practices.

Fifty years of the “war on drugs” has proved that it doesn’t work.

Illegal drugs are among the world’s largest industries and it is now in the hands of criminal cartels. Illegal drug money is a menace in the world, spreading criminality, violence, and suffering.

It’s time that we did something different.

Read the complete report, Licensing and Regulation of the Cannabis Market in England and Wales: Towards a Cost/Benefit Analysis.

Learn More:



this is very interesting, and I like the accessible summary. I would be extremely interested in a meta-analysis on what is needed to get policy unstuck, and which constituencies need to be won over, still.

Thanks Hans. For brass-tacks politics, you're right. This is indeed what is required. In many environments it does seem like women are most open to an honest debate while at the same time retaining a healthy skepticism. In places where they have had referenda, addressing women's concerns were a key to victory.

For one great article see: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/11/the-secret-ingredien...

It's important to note the concerns that were addressed - namely, ensuring that minors would not have access to regulated marijuana and that the revenues would be used for the public good. In other words, ensuring that this is indeed sound, sensible policy.

Do you have any thoughts about what might be key demographics in your environment?

I will help the poor people in my country also I will acheive a peace in middle east

Thanks Kamal for the reply. How might it help peace? Has the drug war actually made conflicts worse in the region?

To open the projects of unemployment
And guide people to teach in the areas of non-literate
And advise people not to take drugs because of the damaging of drugs
Also in the middle east if they have some body to help and support them they will never take drugs

Add your voice